Oh dear, I wasn't planning to watch the Olympics closing ceremony but I rather enjoyed most of the opening ceremony and circumstances have brought me here. Now during the opening ceremony we saw a piece about the NHS. It wasn't about big pharmaceutical companies, presumably because while they do distribute some useful and effective drugs they also have a poor track record of pushing drugs on those who don't really need them and charging too much to those whose illness, or perceived illness, may have made them easy targets. But somehow in the closing ceremony there's a big celebration of the fashion industry. Does the fashion industry do ANYTHING other than tell women they need more and different overpriced clothes? Does it not just generate need by encouraging people, mostly women, to feel bad about their appearances. Does this not indeed lead to recognised medical conditions like anorexia and body dismorphic disorder?
Big pharma might be horrifically corrupt but at least they do some good for some people. Does big fashion benefit anyone? Third world workers in garment factories are notoriously mistreated. The average Briton has about ten years "worth" of clothes in their wardrobe. It would be better for us all if we closed the whole industry down and transferred those workers to pharmaceutical companies work on developing new medicines and treatments. Or better still get them working in the NHS, and start properly funding medical research in the UK so we don't leave it all in the corrupt hands of big pharma... How is this not obvious?
Now of course my outrage has been ignited a bit further by the arrival of Russell Brand. It's a matter of hours since he (allegedly) horrifically sexually harassed a woman. His track record on the matter is less than great.
...And now two male singers are onstage in suits and jackets next to Jessie J who is dressed in a flesh-coloured catsuit which makes her look basically naked. I'm all FOR nudity, but lets just have men and women nude please, otherwise it's creepy and presents women as sex objects.
Maybe they were inspired by the sexism of having only the men's marathon winner being given his gold by the big cheese. Interestingly as the winner was Ugandan, footage must now (I assume, wasn't shown) exist of David Cameron and Boris Johnson standing up for the national anthem of a country where homosexuality is illegal. Much as I lack respect for the Lib Dems, it does make me rather wish Brian Paddick was Mayor of London.
Oh hang on - here's Eric Idle. Brilliant, how fun and cheering. And nicely atheist too, bit like John Lennon's Imagine earlier. I'm starting to forgive them. Oh what's that behind him? A row of women dressed as angels in bikinis. Facepalm.
I had better sign off before they get Jim Davidson on!
Sunday, August 12, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I saw the scantily-clad women assigned to look like they were playing instruments like in a Robert Palmer video circa 1986.
I would be in favour of banning 'fashion' altogether! Lol.
It has certainly made me feel bad about my appreance in the past (not that it ever made me change much, lol).
Who was it who described fashion as "clothes designed by gay men for women who look like boys"?
I have heard that Martin, and certainly it can seem true although I feel I must add that my gay friends are some of the least sizeist people I know. I think the reality is that most designers are women or gay men because straight men are told it is not for them. Sexism often means the men rise to the top faster. Plus the media always wants to talk about the designers who use sickly thin models and thus they rise to the top. So I'm not prepared to blame gay men for the mess. Phillip Green does not (as far as I know) identify as gay.
Post a Comment